Illegal Immigrants are a problem.  When our immigration system is run properly, it works.  We are supposed to permit good people into the country in numbers that permit and encourage assimilation, rather than Balkanization.

What we have today is dangerous.  Those coming in from south of the border refuse to assimilate.  Worse, they bring  the social and moral standards of their home country, and insist that we adopt to their norms.

When we look at our Muslim problem, we find the situation is even more dangerous, and poses a genuine existential threat.  Islam demands that practitioners conquer and subjugate all non-believers. 

Do you understand?

To be a faithful and good Muslim, you must spread Islam by any means necessary.  You are permitted to lie to achieve your goals.  Islam permits the murder and enslavement of all non-believers.  They conquer many lands demographically, undermining the existing culture through simple population numbers until their strength is sufficient to raise the flag of Mohammed over the nation's capital.

If you do not come to grips with this fundamental aspect of the system of Islam, you simply can not understand that theirs is a goal every bit as insipid and immoral as is the  Collectivism being thrust upon us politically from the Left.

Collectivists will send men and women, armed with the badges and guns of the State, to enforce that you contribute your financial share to society and bend knee to their will. 

The good Muslim will cut your head off if you resist Mohammed and Allah...or give birth to a baby that will, one day, take your head or the head of your child. 

Polygonal Battlespace.  You forget this at your peril.

From a discussion over at Washington Reb, Uncle Kenny developed the taxonomy below.  With his permission, we offer it here so that we of the Hard Right can discuss the immigration issue from a common reference point.

It was created because we were discussing the moral position that we as a culture could take that would sit well with our internal moral compass, to deny Islam its goal of conquering America.

As a people, we Americans have a distaste for condemning an entire group of people for the bad actors within the group.  Just as we would all agree that you may not be held responsible for the actions of your brother, we have a hard time condemning all Muslims for the actions of those who actively try to kill us.

But, what about when the stated goal of the group is to conquer you, by any means available?  Membership in such a group taints every individual.

As we like to do here at Memento Mori, we put forth possible solutions, as we are not content to simply whine about problems and verbally masturbate amongst ourselves while waiting for others to take action.  So, we offer these points for your consideration as remedy for defending the republic from the Muslim threat.

One: Understand that this is a real war.  All Muslims are, by their faith, required to conquer non-believers.  There is enough blood on the hands of Muslims today that you should get the point.  This is an existential threat to America.  If they win, we die.  There is no middle ground.  There is no peaceful co-existence from their perspective.

We are not talking about Christians, Catholics, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus or any other religion today that is actively hunting and killing non-believers.  Only Muslims do this, and by any moral standard they are wrong.

By any moral standard, we are entitled to defend ourselves from their aggression, by any means necessary.

Two: Understand that there are no innocent Muslims in this war.  If they are good Muslims in the eyes of Allah, they must, by faith, support and work toward the rise of Islam as the singular political and religious power on the Earth.  If the Muslim in your neighborhood truly does not work against America, he is not a good Muslim and Allah is not pleased.

Three: Understand that when you are faced with an existential threat, when someone is determined to kill you, there are no rules.  Life and Death are the only possible outcomes, and there is no place for moral squeamishness.

Since it is impossible for us to determine the good guys from the bad guys, we must simply refuse to permit any of them within killing range of our children. 

Would you permit a rattle snake to sleep in the nursery?  We know enough about rattle snakes to be concerned, but you have no proof that particular rattle snake has any intention of biting your baby.

Sorry, the rattle snakes have to go.

Four: Having determined that they must all go, we confront a few constructs of society that hinder our ability to simply raid every Mosque and put declared Muslims on flights to Kabul.

Here is where we get into the brilliant articulation offered by Kenny that gives us a roadmap for defending ourselves within a moral framework.  The dispositions offered below are mine, not Kenny's - we are simply using his framework.  So don't call him a heartless SOB based on my suggestions below.

We have two broad groups: Citizens and non-Citizens.

We have the right as a society to close our borders to anyone who is not a Citizen.  It is a moral right and a Constitutional right. 

Non-Citizens: If you are not a US Citizen, you are in our country and you are a Muslim, or from an Islamic country - get out.  Right Now.  I do not care if you are a college student or a World Class neurosurgeon - get out.  If you return we will send you to Gitmo, put you on trial for your life as an enemy of the republic and execute you if found guilty of trying to sneak back into our country for unknown and suspicious mopery without a permit. 

Citizens: As you can see in Kenny's chart, there are three types of US Citizen.  For our purposes, they can be lumped together.

I think most of us would agree that we should not simply round up every US Citizen who is a Muslim and throw them out.  It sets a bad precedent and it offends our base sensibilities.  As a people, we do not criminalize thoughts and potential of our Citizens, we punish bad actions.

We can handle the Constitutional impediment (Freedom of Religion) this way: As a culture we declare that the religion of Islam is not a true religion, but more accurately a political perversion of religion that demands subjugation of all other religions and political systems on Earth. 

This puts the practice of Islam in the same philosophical realm as the practice of Communism...sedition and Treason. By practice we mean the intentional advancement of stated goals, in these cases the destruction of our Constitutional Government.  (It is also the same as Liberal subversion, but that is another column.)

Any Citizen who actively pursues the overthrow of Constitutional Government is guilty of Treason.

Practicing Islam in America is Treason.

How do we get our Muslim Citizens to stop practicing? 

First, we point out that practicing Islam in an Islamic country is no problem, so perhaps leaving America is the best option for the family.

Secondly, though the Left has successfully managed to blunt the stigma of being a Communist in America, the fact remains that Communism is incompatible with American society.  We once banned Communists from entering the country.  We also forced our Citizens who were Communists to sign a Loyalty Oath.

We should return to this practice for the Communists in our midst and expand it to the Muslims in our midst. (We'll get to the Liberals soon!)

You simply can not maintain your American Citizenship if you are not loyal to the Constitution.  If you do not sign the oath, we will strip your Citizenship and throw you out.

If you sign the oath, we'll take you at your word...once.

Sign the oath and you may stay.  But as we have determined that Islam is a political movement hostile to the American Constitution (not a religion), we will bulldoze every Mosque in America.  If your loyalty is truly to the Constitutional republic, you shouldn't have a problem with that, as an American you should agree that we can not tolerate meeting places to plot and practice sedition and Treason.

Islam is not a religion.  That is the point.  The Koran demands religious and political domination of the world.  Islam is a political system that uses religious fervor to achieve its goals.

You have signed an oath, and we will watch you.

Break the oath, or hold meetings in a neighborhood basement, we will treat you the same as we would treat a group of Communists plotting their coup.

How do we get from where we are today to implementing the common sense suggestions above?

First: Stop being silent.  Start a Verbal Ruckus.

Second: Send III and Hard Right politicians to the US House, men and women who will stand on the floor of the United States Congress and say the words that need to be said by those sent to Washington to protect our children.

We will have a chance as a nation when my Congressman stands in the Well and has the stones to say: Communists, Liberals, Collectivists and Muslims actively seek to destroy our Constitutional republic, and there is no place for any of them in our country!  It is time that we are rid of these inhumane pieces of garbage and begin to live once again by our Founding Principles.

If we do not soon elect politicians who will do it, one day, the task will fall to Patriots.

Sam
III

Tweet 

Today in the News 

Record Deficit:

The Treasury Department said the Government spent $150.4 billion more in November than they stole from us.  OK, they didn't exactly spin it that way.  But they did say it was a record.

The reality is simple: If we do not stop spending on Entitlements, we will crash.  While the Political Class diddles one another over earmarks and arguing whether the Status Quo tax rates are a cut or an increase, every real facet of the economy worsens. 

We will stop spending on Entitlements.  It is unavoidable.

The only real question at this point is if the country will still have a Government in place when it happens, or will we have collapsed into complete anarchy... 

President Obama...Clinton:

There have been rumors for a while now that President Obama is having issues with reality.  Could it be that he is truly becoming unhinged?  I have a hard time concluding that Bill Clinton was invited by President Obama simply to help sell the tax deal to other Democrats.

One must consider that adults in our permanent power structure - those folks who are there as Presidents come and go - have decided that it may be a good idea to have Clinton in the wings. 

Could we be witnessing the setting stage for a 25th Amendment move?

British Students Protest:

Before we dismiss the students who are raising a fuss in Britain about tuition hikes, consider: Those protesting are of an age that they were born into the system pretty much as it exists today.  The system is Socialism, and they do not know of any other reality.  The Subjects of Britain (yes, they are Subjects, not Citizens) are taxed at vulgar rates. 

But there is a social contract in place between the Subjects and Government.  In return for the outrageous portion of income paid by the average Brit through income tax, fuel surcharges, VAT, et cetera, Government has said: Pay us what we ask, and we will take care of you.  We will give you health care and we will provide education, and all the world will be beautiful.

But Government is breaking the contract.  Government wants all the tax revenue and they want their Subjects to pay more.

The sadness is that the British have no real legacy of Liberty, so they do not consider one of their options is to be rid of the contract and their Masters.  They simply want other Masters who will give them more.

But, it is from such circumstances some bright lad or lass may consider a novel idea...revolution!

House Dems Block Tax Deal:

Establishment Republicans consider a deal that keeps the current tax rates in place as a win.  Why?  Because they are Establishment Republicans, and they like the Status Quo.  They are concerned that the 113th will not stand for the Status Quo, so they cut the deal now.  Many of the new folks would argue for tax cuts, and the Establishment Republican machine simply does not share that agenda.

And if the Dems can tie themselves in a knot at the same time, the cake has icing.